Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 conference-abstract

Prognostic value of KRAS exon 3, exon 4, and NRAS mutations in pathological stage III colon cancer.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

224 Background: The molecular status of RAS , BRAF and MSI may serve as a biomarker for estimating survival for patients with both metastatic colorectal cancer and colon cancer (CC) undergoing curative surgery. However, there are few reports on CC patients with minor RAS mutations ( KRAS exon 3, exon 4 and NRAS , MTs), and their clinical significance remains unclear. Methods: We examined clinicopathological variables and prognosis in patients with surgically resected pathological stage III (pStage III) CC who were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Associations between molecular status of RAS , BRAF and MSI including minor RAS MTs and recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) were assessed using a Cox Hazard model. Results: Between 2018 and 2022, we measured the RAS / BRAF mutation status in 2,014 patients with unresectable or resectable colorectal cancer, including recurrent cases. Of these, a total of 309 patients with pathological stage III colon cancer from the cecum to the upper rectum had their RAS / BRAF status examined, and 254 of them who received adjuvant chemotherapy were included in the analysis. Among these patients, KRAS exon 2, minor RAS , BRAF mutations, and RAS / BRAF wild-type status were detected in 37.8%, 7.1%, 11.0%, and 44.1%, respectively. The minor RAS MTs group was MSS /pMMR in all cases and had a low prevalence of pT4 (15.8%), whereas left-sided primary tumor location (77.8%) were more common than in the other groups. Three-year RFS/OS rates were 76.7%/96.6% for the KRAS exon 2 MT group, 94.4%/94.1% for the minor RAS MTs group, 71.4%/81.8% for the BRAF MT group, and 80.9%/97.3% for the WT group, respectively. The minor RAS MTs group showed a tendency toward better RFS, though there was no significant difference when compared with the KRAS exon 2 MT group (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03–1.60; P = 0.13), the BRAF MT group (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.02–1.41; P = 0.06), or the WT group (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.04–1.92; P = 0.16). Furthermore, a comparison of each minor RAS mutation variant with the KRAS exon 2 mutation showed no significant differences in RFS. In multivariate analysis, pN2 was an independent factor associated with RFS (HR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.46–4.41; P < 0.001) and the presence of minor RAS MTs was also a promising factor associated with RFS, though there was no significant difference (HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.03–1.59; P = 0.13). Conclusions: Patients with pStage III CC and minor RAS MTs exhibit distinct clinical and pathological features, with a low incidence of postoperative recurrence and potentially favorable survival outcomes.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.

Titre Crossref
Prognostic value of <i>KRAS</i> exon 3, exon 4, and <i>NRAS</i> mutations in pathological stage III colon cancer.
Date Crossref
10/01/2026
Éditeur
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.