High-Dose vs Standard-Dose Influenza Vaccine in Older Adults With Diabetes

Résumé fourni par la source

Importance: Influenza infection poses a substantial risk of severe complications, particularly in older adults and high-risk populations, such as individuals with diabetes. The high-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) has demonstrated superior efficacy against influenza infection compared with the standard-dose inactivated influenza vaccine (SD-IIV) among adults 65 years or older. However, there is limited evidence on its effectiveness in preventing severe respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with diabetes. Objective: To investigate the relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IIV vs SD-IIV against severe respiratory and cardiovascular outcomes according to diabetes status and across diabetes subgroups. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of DANFLU-2, a pragmatic, open-label, individually randomized clinical trial conducted in Denmark during the 2022/2023 to 2024/2025 influenza seasons. Adults 65 years or older were eligible for inclusion regardless of comorbidities. Data were obtained from nationwide health registries and analyzed from June to October 2025. Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated 1:1 to receive HD-IIV or SD-IIV. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcomes included respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations. The potential effect modification by diabetes status and across diabetes subgroups was tested. Results: Among 332 438 participants (mean [SD] age, 73.7 [5.8] years; 161 538 female individuals [48.6%]), 43 881 (13.2%) had diabetes. Overall, HD-IIV compared with SD-IIV was associated with reduced cardiorespiratory hospitalization, cardiovascular hospitalization, and influenza hospitalization. Effect estimates were similar for participants with and without diabetes for cardiorespiratory hospitalization (diabetes: rVE, 7.4%; 95% CI, -2.5% to 16.3%; no diabetes: rVE, 5.3%; 95% CI, 0.4%-10.0%; interaction P = .69), cardiovascular hospitalization (diabetes: rVE, 12.0%; 95% CI, -0.9% to 23.3%; no diabetes: rVE, 6.0%; 95% CI, -0.4% to 12.0%; interaction P = .38), and influenza hospitalization (diabetes: rVE, 41.6%; 95% CI, 5.0%-64.7%, vs no diabetes: rVE, 44.3%; 95% CI, 25.3%-58.7%; interaction P = .87). Duration of diabetes appeared to modify the effect of HD-IIV vs SD-IIV for cardiorespiratory hospitalization, with suggested benefit of HD-IIV in participants with diabetes duration longer than 5 years (rVE, 20.4%; 95% CI, 5.3%-33.1%), but not in those with shorter duration (rVE, -0.4%; 95% CI, -13.8% to 11.5%; interaction P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: The trial results suggest that, among adults 65 years or older, HD-IIV provided consistent benefit for cardiorespiratory, cardiovascular, and influenza hospitalizations compared with SD-IIV, regardless of diabetes status. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05517174.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.