Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 peer-review

Comment on essd-2025-659

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
114Institutions déclarées
23Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : fr, gb, no, de, be, nl, au, us, bm, is, ar, es, id, jp, ie, Afrique du Sud, ca, at, it, ch, cn, me, nz. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract. Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and their redistribution among the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere in a changing climate is critical to better understand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climate change. Here we describe and synthesise datasets and methodologies to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO2 emissions (EFOS) are based on energy statistics and cement production data. Emissions from land-use change (ELUC) are estimated by bookkeeping models based on land-use and land-use change data. Atmospheric CO2 concentration is measured at surface stations, and the global atmospheric CO2 growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The global net uptake of CO2 by the ocean (SOCEAN, called the ocean sink) is estimated with global ocean biogeochemistry models and observation-based fCO2-products. The global net uptake of CO2 by the land (SLAND, called the land sink) is estimated with dynamic global vegetation models. Additional lines of evidence on land and ocean sinks are provided by atmospheric inversions, atmospheric oxygen measurements, ocean interior observation-based estimates, and Earth System Models. The sum of all sources and sinks results in the carbon budget imbalance (BIM), a measure of imperfect data and incomplete understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as ±1σ. For the year 2024, EFOS increased by 1.1 % relative to 2023, with fossil emissions at 10.3 ± 0.5 GtC yr−1 (including the cement carbonation sink, 0.2 GtC/yr), ELUC was 1.3 ± 0.7 GtC yr−1, for total anthropogenic CO2 emissions of 11.6 ± 0.9 GtC yr−1 (42.4 ± 3.2 GtCO2 yr−1). Also, for 2024, GATM was 7.9 ± 0.2 GtC yr−1 (3.73 ± 0.1 ppm yr−1), 2.2 GtC above the 2023 growth rate. SOCEAN was 3.4 ± 0.4 GtC yr−1 and SLAND was 1.9 ± 1.1 GtC yr−1, leaving a large negative BIM (−1.7 GtC yr−1), suggesting that the total sink or GATM is strongly overestimated in 2024. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration averaged over 2024 reached 422.8 ± 0.1 ppm. Preliminary data for 2025 suggest an increase in EFOS relative to 2024 of +1.1 % (0.2 % to 2.2 %) globally, and atmospheric CO2 concentration increasing by 2.3 ppm reaching 425.7 ppm, 52 % above the pre-industrial level (around 278 ppm in 1750). Overall, the mean and trend in the components of the global carbon budget are consistently estimated over the period 1959–2024, with a near-zero overall budget imbalance, although discrepancies of up to around 1 GtC yr−1 persist for the representation of annual to decadal variability in CO2 fluxes. Comparison of estimates from multiple approaches and observations shows: (1) a persistent large uncertainty in the estimate of land-use change emissions, (2) a low agreement between the different methods on the magnitude of the land CO2 flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) a discrepancy between the different methods on the mean ocean sink. This living data update documents changes in methods and datasets applied to this most-recent global carbon budget as well as evolving community understanding of the global carbon cycle. The data presented in this work are available at https://doi.org/10.18160/GCP-2025 (Friedlingstein et al., 2025c).

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comment on essd-2025-659
Date Crossref
11/01/2026
Éditeur
Copernicus GmbH
Type
peer-review

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Centre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueÉcole PolytechniqueUniversity of ExeterUniversité Paris Sciences et LettresÉcole Normale Supérieure - PSLSorbonne UniversitéLaboratoire de Météorologie DynamiqueInstitut Pierre-Simon LaplaceUniversity of East AngliaNorwich Research ParkTyndall CentreCICERO Center for International Climate ResearchAlfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und MeeresforschungUniversity of BremenFlanders Marine InstituteHelmholtz-Zentrum HereonMax Planck Institute for MeteorologyWageningen University & ResearchUniversity of GroningenLudwig-Maximilians-Universität MünchenCSIRO Oceans and AtmosphereUniversité de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-YvelinesCommissariat à l'Énergie Atomique et aux Énergies AlternativesUniversité Paris-SaclayLaboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'EnvironnementCEA Paris-SaclayNational Oceanic and Atmospheric AdministrationNOAA Pacific Marine Environmental LaboratoryKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyUniversity of MiamiBermuda Institute of Ocean SciencesArizona State UniversityUniversity of ReadingMarine and Freshwater Research InstituteInstituto Nacional de Investigacion y Desarrollo PesqueroBarcelona Supercomputing CenterUniversitat Politècnica de CatalunyaUdayana UniversityJapan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and TechnologyUniversity of Maryland, College ParkOak Ridge National LaboratoryEarth System Science Interdisciplinary CenterMarine InstituteStellenbosch UniversityUniversity of California, DavisStanford UniversityJapan Meteorological AgencyAppalachian State UniversityTula FoundationNational Centre for Earth ObservationUniversity of EdinburghNSF National Center for Atmospheric ResearchNSF NCAR Climate and Global Dynamics LaboratoryBjerknes Centre for Climate ResearchUniversity of BergenInternational Institute for Applied Systems AnalysisJoint Research CentreETH ZurichSwiss Data Science CenterInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant DynamicsLaboratoire de Géologie de l’École Normale SupérieureUniversity of OxfordPotsdam Institute for Climate Impact ResearchUniversität HamburgThe University of TokyoCooperative Institute for Research in Environmental SciencesUrbana UniversityNanjing UniversityInstitute of Applied EnergyScripps Institution of OceanographyUniversity of California San DiegoUtrecht UniversityUniversity of Technology SydneyMinistry of EducationInstitute of Remote Sensing and Digital EarthAerospace Information Research InstituteLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryCalifornia Institute of TechnologyJet Propulsion LaboratoryChina Meteorological AdministrationTsinghua UniversityLaboratoire d'Océanographie et du Climat : Expérimentations et Approches NumériquesInstitut de Recherche pour le DéveloppementNational Centre for Atmospheric ScienceLamont-Doherty Earth ObservatoryColumbia UniversityEnvironment and Climate Change CanadaUniversity of Alaska FairbanksCarbon180National Institute for Environmental StudiesNORCE Research ASBoston CollegeNOAA Atlantic Oceanographic and Meteorological LaboratoriesSun Yat-sen UniversityUniversité Libre de BruxellesLeibniz Institute for Baltic Sea Research WarnemündePrinceton UniversityMax Planck Institute for BiogeochemistryUniversity of BernOeschger Centre for Climate Change ResearchUniversité de BordeauxEnvironnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et ContinentauxCentre National de Recherches MétéorologiquesInstitute of Tibetan Plateau ResearchUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesUniversity of TasmaniaAustralian Antarctic DivisionMeteorological Research InstituteFood and Agriculture Organization of the United NationsStatistics New ZealandEducation New ZealandUniversity of OtagoPeking UniversityNanjing University of Information Science and Technology

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.