Towards sub-milliarcsecond astrometric precision using high-cadence seeing-limited imaging
Rattachement africain : us, il, kr, nz, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT The Earth’s atmospheric turbulence degrades the precision of ground-based astrometry. Here, we discuss these limitations and propose that, with proper treatment of systematics and by leveraging the many epochs available from the Korean Microlensing Telescope Network (KMTNet), seeing-limited observations can reach sub-milliarcsecond precision. Such observations may be instrumental for the detection of Galactic black holes via microlensing. We present our methodology and pipeline for precise astrometric measurements using seeing-limited observations. The method is a variant of Gaia’s Astrometric Global Iterative Solution that include several detrending steps. Tests on 6500 images of the same field, obtained by KMTNet with typical seeing condition of 1 arcsec and pixel scale of 0.4 arcsec, suggest that we can achieve, at the bright end (mag $\lesssim$ 17), per-epoch relative astrometric precision of ${\sim }$5 mas and relative proper motion precision of 0.1–0.2 mas yr$^{-1}$ over a baseline of approximately five years, using data from the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory (CTIO) site. Time binning on 5–20 d cadences improves the bright-source precision to $\sim$2 mas per coordinate on astrometric microlensing-relevant time-scales. The precision is estimated using bootstrap simulations and further validated by comparing results from two independent KMTNet telescopes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Towards sub-milliarcsecond astrometric precision using high-cadence seeing-limited imaging
- Date Crossref
- 09/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.