A Comparative Study on Semi-Supervised Learning Algorithms for Fault Management in Optical Networks
Rattachement africain : br, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
In recent years, the demand for reliable optical networks has intensified due to the rise of bandwidth-intensive applications. Faults in these networks can degrade transmission quality, leading to packet loss and service disruptions, making effective failure management essential for maintaining network availability and compliance with Service Level Agreements (SLAs). While most contemporary approaches rely on supervised learning (SL), which requires large amounts of often scarce fault data for training, this study explores semi-supervised learning (Semi-SL) algorithms for fault management in optical networks, which rely only on normal operating condition data, thus reducing the dependency on scarce fault data. We evaluate several cluster-based algorithms and dimensionality reduction techniques using a dataset from an optical testbed. Results based on Type I/II errors show that all techniques performed with an average accuracy exceeding 90%. The Autoencoder yielded the best fault management performance (96.46% of average accuracy), followed by Gaussian Mixture Model (92.5%), Mahalanobis Squared-Distance (92.48%), Density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise (92.42%), Fuzzy C-means (92.12%), K-means (92.09%), and Principal Component Analysis (90.22%).
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Comparative Study on Semi-Supervised Learning Algorithms for Fault Management in Optical Networks
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Sociedad Brasileira de Telecomunicacoes
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.