Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Unveiling the Temporal Dynamics of White Matter Hyperintensities Related to Alzheimer's Disease in Down Syndrome

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background Down syndrome (DS) is a genetically determined form of Alzheimer's disease (AD) characterized by a low prevalence of traditional age‐related vascular risk factors. Emerging evidence indicates that white matter hyperintensities (WMH) are frequent in DS and linked to small vessel disease and neurodegeneration. However, the temporal dynamics of WMH and their relationship with AD pathology remain unexplored in DS. Using an optimal longitudinal preprocessing pipeline, we aimed to determine the evolution of WMH across the AD continuum in DS and define their associations with baseline clinical and pathological characteristics. Method Longitudinal study including 47 euploid healthy controls (HC) from the SPIN cohort, and 86 individuals with DS from the DABNI cohort, who underwent 2 to 4 3T‐MRI visits (Table 1). The DS cohort included individuals with asymptomatic (aDS, n = 66) and symptomatic AD (sDS; n = 18). WMH were segmented on high‐resolution FLAIR images using the longitudinal pipeline from the Lesion Segmentation Toolbox in SPM12. Individuals were classified as WMH Regressor, Stable, and Progressor using a previously proposed threshold (±75 mm 3 /year, Al‐Janabi et al., 2019). Non‐parametric tests assessed the effect of sociodemographic and genetic factors, AD clinical stage, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD biomarkers (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, pTau181, and NfL), WMH volume, and microbleed status on annual WMH volume changes. Result WMH volume significantly decreased with age in DS (rho=‐0.37, p <0.001; Figure 1A‐B) but not in HC ( p = 0.1). This decrease was more pronounced in sDS than aDS (Figure 1C). Regressor individuals were significantly more frequent in sDS (66.67%) than aDS (13.64%) or HC (12.77%). Sex, APOEε4 status, intellectual disability, and microbleed status did not influence WMH changes (Figure 1D‐E‐F). CSF‐pTau181 and NfL, but not Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, related to annual WMH changes (Figure 2A‐B‐C). Additionaly, higher baseline WMH volume correlated with decreasing WMH changes (rho=‐0.33, p <0.002, Figure 2E). Sensitivity analyses considering white matter atrophy confirmed the robustness of our findings. Conclusion WMH decreased more frequently over time in DS compared to the general population, particularly in individuals with symptomatic AD and high baseline WMH volume. This unexpected finding, which cannot be attributed to atrophy, offers novel insights into WMH aetiology in DS and has significant implications for targeted interventions using WMH as an outcome.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Unveiling the Temporal Dynamics of White Matter Hyperintensities Related to Alzheimer's Disease in Down Syndrome
Date Crossref
01/12/2025
Éditeur
Wiley
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Down syndrome and intellectual disability researchGenetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.