Longitudinal Observation of Children with Achondroplasia: Findings from a Global Natural History Study (ACHieve)
Rattachement africain : ie, dk, gb, us, es, at, de, ch, nz, cn, fr, it, ca, au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
INTRODUCTION: The ACHieve study assessed growth velocity, body proportionality, and clinical events in children with achondroplasia not receiving growth-promoting therapy. METHODS: ACHieve was a global, longitudinal, prospective, observational study. Children ≤8 years old with achondroplasia were enrolled and evaluated every 6 months for anthropometric parameters and clinical events. RESULTS: ACHieve enrolled 259 children in 15 countries, including 83 from China. Median follow-up was 21 months; median age of diagnosis was approximately 52 weeks in China and 2 weeks elsewhere. Growth parameters were similar regardless of region. Mean annualized growth velocity was 9.3 cm/year for males and 10.4 cm/year for females at age 1 and decreased to 4.1 cm/year and 4.6 cm/year, respectively, at age 4. Upper-to-lower-body segment ratio was generally consistent across regions. Overall, 77.2% of participants experienced clinical events, 34.0% of which were considered related to achondroplasia. Two deaths occurred (one accident and one cardiac arrest of unknown origin). CONCLUSION: ACHieve was one of the largest longitudinal natural history studies of achondroplasia to date and included the largest prospective Chinese achondroplasia cohort. The results demonstrated common trajectories in growth parameters regardless of region, indicating the generalizability of findings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Longitudinal Observation of Children with Achondroplasia: Findings from a Global Natural History Study (ACHieve)
- Date Crossref
- 08/01/2026
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.