Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 other

Individualized prediction of clinical progression to dementia using plasma biomarkers in non-demented elderly

0Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
4Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background We aimed to develop individualized predictions for risk of developing any-cause dementia and Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia, in individuals with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or mild cognitive impairment (MCI), using plasma phosphorylated-tau-181 (pTau181), phosphorylated-tau-217 (pTau217; in a subset), amyloid beta1-42/1–40 (Aβ42/40), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and/or neurofilament light (NfL). Methods From the Amsterdam Dementia Cohort we included 314 individuals with SCD (age 61 ± 9 years, n = 184 (59%) male, MMSE 29 ± 1) and 253 individuals with MCI (age 65 ± 7 years, n = 165 (65%) male, MMSE 27 ± 2), who had annual follow-up (median duration 2.4 years). Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to calculate probabilities for progression to dementia and were externally validated in MEMENTO and AIBL cohorts. Results During follow-up 20 SCD and 99 MCI patients developed dementia. For MCI patients who progressed to any form of dementia, plasma GFAP contributed on top of age, sex, and MMSE score in the parsimonious individualized prognostic model (C-index = 0.69 [95%CI = 0.63; 0.76]). With AD-dementia as the outcome, GFAP and pTau181 were selected in the parsimonious model on top of the demographic variables (C-index = 0.71 [95%CI = 0.65; 0.76]). In the subset of 197 MCI individuals with pTau217 measurements, pTau217 was selected in the parsimonious model on top of the demographic variables (C-index = 0.75 [95%CI = 0.69; 0.79]). External validation demonstrated that the models are robust in a memory clinic setting. Conclusions Our prediction models have utility for clinical practice to calculate progression probabilities for development of dementia in individual patients living with MCI over a 1-, 3- and 5-year time period.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

La source scientifique ouverte est momentanément indisponible.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.