Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future directions
Rattachement africain : cn, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Endometrial cancer (EC) treatment has been revolutionized by the integration of immunotherapy, particularly for molecularly defined subsets of patients. The classification of EC into DNA polymerase epsilon-mutated (POLE-mutant), mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR), p53-abnormal, and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) subtypes provides a critical framework for predicting response to immune checkpoint blockade. dMMR and POLE-mutant tumors, with their hypermutated and immunogenic phenotypes, demonstrate exceptional sensitivity to Programmed Death-1(PD-1) inhibitors such as pembrolizumab and dostarlimab in clinical trials. In contrast, overcoming the immunoresistant nature of NSMP and p53-abnormal EC requires innovative combinations, exemplified by the success of pembrolizumab plus the multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor lenvatinib. Recent practice-changing clinical trials have further established combination strategies incorporating PD-1 blockade with chemotherapy as a new first-line standard for advanced disease, marking a paradigm shift in the management of advanced EC. This review synthesizes the mechanistic basis for these approaches, the compelling clinical evidence supporting approved therapies, and the frontier of investigational strategies, including cellular therapies, novel immune checkpoints, and rational combination regimens-aimed at expanding the benefit of immunotherapy to a broader range of patients with EC.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Immunotherapy in endometrial cancer: mechanisms, clinical evidence, and future directions
- Date Crossref
- 09/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.