Outcomes of patients with melanoma brain metastases treated with ipilimumab and nivolumab with or without upfront comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background The efficacy of ipilimumab and nivolumab (ipi/nivo) for melanoma brain metastases (MBMs) has been previously reported, leading to uncertainty regarding the optimal role of comprehensive stereotactic radiosurgery (cSRS). We therefore conducted a single-institution retrospective study to compare outcomes of upfront versus deferred cSRS for MBM treated with ipi/nivo. Methods We identified patients who started ipi/nivo for newly diagnosed MBMs between 2018 and 2023, with or without upfront cSRS. Patients with >15 MBMs, leptomeningeal disease, or whole-brain radiotherapy at baseline were excluded. Outcomes were compared using multivariable regression and reported as adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) with 95% CIs. Results Of the 132 patients identified, 52.3% received upfront cSRS and 47.7% did not. Patients who received upfront cSRS had larger maximum MBMs (median 2.3 vs 0.7 cm; P < .001), more symptomatic MBMs (59.4% vs 11.1%; P < .001), higher rates of upfront craniotomy (47.8% vs 7.9%; P < .001), and fewer BRAF V600 mutations (34.8% vs 54.0%; P = .035). Upfront cSRS was not associated with longer overall survival (median 47.0 mo vs not reached; aHR = 1.01 [95% CI, 0.60-1.68]; P = .98) but was associated with reduced incidence of intracranial progression (median 37.6 vs 5.5 mo; aHR = 0.40 [95% CI, 0.25-0.64]; P < .001). Conclusions In this retrospective study, upfront cSRS was more often used in patients with higher-risk MBM and was associated with improved intracranial control, although no significant survival benefit was observed. These findings suggest that starting ipi/nivo alone may be reasonable for lower-risk MBM, but prospective studies are needed to guide optimal integration of cSRS.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.