Development of Entrustable Professional Activities for the University of New Mexico Nephrology Fellowship Training Program

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Rationale & Objective Competency-based medical education emphasizes observable skills rather than time-based training. Entrustable Professional Activities (EPA) transform competencies into distinct, assessable clinical tasks but have not yet been systematically developed for U.S nephrology fellowships. We aimed to create and achieve consensus on a set of nephrology-specific EPAs and align them with Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) competency standards. Study Design A consensus framework was developed using an online 3-round modified Delphi method. Settings & Participants Study was conducted within the University of New Mexico nephrology fellowship program. Participants included eight faculty nephrologists and one nephrology fellow. Analytical Approach An initial EPA list was generated by the study team using program objectives, literature review, and clinician insight. Participants rated each EPA using a 5-point Likert scale with consensus requiring strict criteria. Final EPAs were independently mapped to ACGME nephrology program requirements to ensure alignment with national competency. Results Nine study participants (100% response rate) completed all survey rounds. Through iterative consensus, utilizing strict criteria, a final list of 22 distinct EPAs were achieved covering core domains of practice including dialysis management, acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease, electrolyte abnormalities, hypertension, kidney stones, glomerular disease, pregnancy, transplant care, and education. Mapping demonstrated that the EPAs sufficiently corresponded to the breadth of ACGME-required sub competencies, offering a practical framework for translating broad milestones into observable clinical tasks. Limitations The study was conducted at a single fellowship program with a small number of participants which may limit generalizability. Implementation feasibility, resource implications, and potential unintended consequences such as checklist mentality and documentation burden were evaluated during a subsequent phase of the study. Conclusions We developed the first consensus-consensus based set of EPAs geared for U.S based nephrology fellowship programs while being systematically aligned with ACGME program requirements. This framework provides a foundation for standardized assessment and curriculum development in nephrology and may inform broader efforts to implement EPA-based evaluation across fellowship programs nationally.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.