Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 review

Preventing Parastomal Hernias After Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit: A Systematic Review Regarding Surgical Prophylactic Techniques

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it, mt. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background/Objective: Parastomal hernia (PSH) following radical cystectomy (RC) with ileal conduit represents a significant late complication. Preventive strategies have been described but are not yet routinely incorporated into clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review of the current literature to assess the efficacy of PSH preventive techniques for ileal conduit. Methods: A literature search of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases was conducted from 2010 to December 2024 following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were patients undergoing RC with ileal conduit, evaluation of at least one PSH preventive strategy and reporting of PSH incidence or relevant postoperative outcomes. Eligible designs included RCTs and non-randomized cohort studies. Exclusion criteria included urinary diversions other than ileal conduit, non-bladder-related indications, non-extractable outcome data, and non-original publications. Results: Three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and nine non-randomized studies were included in the analysis. Studies investigating both mesh and non-mesh preventive techniques were considered. Clinical PSH recurrence rates following mesh placement ranged from 0.0% to 11.1% among the included studies. RCTs using mesh placement reported conflicting conclusions regarding its protective effects. For non-mesh preventive strategies, clinical PSH recurrence rates ranged from 0.0% to 11.5%. The only RCT focusing on non-mesh approaches reported positive protective effects for the experimental group. All procedures were safe, with no significant increase in complication rates compared to conventional interventions. Conclusions: The low quality of current evidence prevents definitive conclusions regarding the protective effects of both mesh and non-mesh preventive approaches. High-quality evidence is needed to make conclusive statements on this topic. Patients at high risk for PSH development should be offered personalized preoperative counselling and the opportunity to participate in ongoing RCTs.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Preventing Parastomal Hernias After Radical Cystectomy with Ileal Conduit: A Systematic Review Regarding Surgical Prophylactic Techniques
Date Crossref
08/01/2026
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Stoma care and complicationsBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsUrinary and Genital Oncology Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.