Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Assessment of a new unidirectional barbed suture versus a conventional suture for anastomosis during robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in obese patients: BARGASTRO — study protocol for a German randomized active-controlled trial

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : de. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Gastric bypass surgery is an efficient surgical intervention for the treatment of obese patients. The procedure can be performed either laparoscopically or robotic assisted. To simplify the intracorporeal handling of the suture material in a bi- or tri-dimensional plane, a new generation of sutures, named barbed sutures, has been developed recently and is being used for different indications. Barbed sutures allow knotless slippage-resistant suturing due to the self-anchoring elements distributed along the thread length and therefore obviate the need for assistance. Their safety and efficacy have been demonstrated in several meta-analyses and systematic reviews. In the present study, the clinical performance of a new unidirectional barbed suture material, which differs in regard to its configuration from other barbed suture materials, is analysed and compared to a conventional suture material in robotic-assisted gastric bypass surgery to treat morbid obesity. METHODS: The study will be performed as an industry-sponsored, mono-centre, randomized, active-controlled, two-arm, parallel-group, superiority trial. A total of 150 patients will be randomly allocated to both suture types in a 1:1 ratio. The suture material will be used to construct the gastro-jejunal anastomosis as well as the jejuno-jejunal anastomosis. The time needed to create both anastomoses is the primary endpoint. Intraoperative handling of both suture materials, patient satisfaction, pain, and complications occurring during the study will serve as secondary outcomes. Furthermore, the difference in quality of life using two different questionnaires (EQ5D5L and Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS)) will be assessed preoperatively and postoperatively (30 days and 12 months) and will be compared between the suture groups as well as over time. The EQ-5D-5L questionnaire consists of five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain or discomfort, anxiety or depression) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) to record the patient's health status. The BAROS evaluates three sub-categories: The percentage of excess weight loss, the changes in medical conditions, and quality of life, leading to three individual sub-scores, which are added to the final total score defining the failure or success of treatment. The follow-up period is 1 year after surgery. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, the BARGASTRO study will be the largest randomized controlled trial investigating a barbed suture versus a conventional one in robotic-assisted gastric bypass surgery to treat obese patients. The study will provide and report clinical data on evidence level Ib. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05433688. Registered on 12 Oct. 2022.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Assessment of a new unidirectional barbed suture versus a conventional suture for anastomosis during robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery in obese patients: BARGASTRO — study protocol for a German randomized active-controlled trial
Date Crossref
06/01/2026
Éditeur
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • University of Lübeck pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • University Hospital Kiel Department of General pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Department of Medical Scientific Affairs pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, University of Lübeck et Department of General — University Hospital Kiel, avec 1 autre affiliation.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesCardiac and Coronary Surgery TechniquesMinimally Invasive Surgical Techniques

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.