Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2026 article

Ethnic differences in thiamine status persist after adjusting for diet; findings from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey

5Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Thiamine (vitamin B1) status might play a role in cognition and mental health. Recent research suggests that there are ethnic differences in thiamine status. We aimed to test the hypothesis that black individuals have a higher risk of thiamine deficiency than white individuals, based on the erythrocyte transketolase activity coefficient (ETKAC), and assess differences in thiamine intake, using nutritional survey data. METHODS: We used the published data of the UK's National Diet and Nutrition Survey Rolling programme (2008-2019) and examined differences in the ETKAC between ethnicities and risk of thiamine deficiency (ETKAC >1.25). We also used dietary data to determine differences in thiamine intake between ethnic groups. RESULTS: Within the NDNS 2008-2019 ETKAC measurements were available for 5657 participants (5170 white, 92 black, 228 Asian, 93 mixed and 74 other ethnic groups). The median ETKAC of black participants was higher (1.15 (0.08) median (IQR)) than white (1.10 (0.07)) or Asian (1.12 (0.08)), indicating poorer thiamine status among black participants. The prevalence of thiamine deficiency was 5 % among black participants, being greater than among white (0.5 %) and Asian participants (1.3 %). This was independent of age, sex, body composition and socio-economic status. Dietary assessment data suggested that thiamine intake was on average lower for black participants compared to white or Asian participants Including dietary intake into the model was not sufficient to correct for the ethnic difference in thiamine status. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there are ethnic differences in thiamine status that cannot be readily explained by intake alone.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Ethnic differences in thiamine status persist after adjusting for diet; findings from the UK National Diet and Nutrition Survey
Date Crossref
01/04/2026
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Alcoholism and Thiamine DeficiencyVitamin C and Antioxidants ResearchSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.