Aller au contenu principal
2026 article

Association of Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay With Process of Care Measures for Critically Ill Patients

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
7Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : ca, th. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVES: To explore the association between a prolonged emergency department (ED) length of stay and the deployment of process of care measures (e.g., low tidal volume ventilation) for critically ill patients. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Eight academic ICUs in Toronto. PATIENTS: Mechanically ventilated adult patients who were directly admitted to the ICU from the ED from June 2014 to February 2023. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The cohort was divided into a short ED stay group (i.e., < 6 hr) and a prolonged ED stay group (i.e., from 6 to 24 hr). We used propensity score methods and multivariable logistic regression models to estimate the association between a prolonged ED stay and the receipt of process of care measures on day 2 after ICU admission, adjusting for baseline characteristics. Associations were reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% CIs. We included 7072 patients, of whom 1462 (21%) had a prolonged ED stay. Both groups had comparable severity of illness at baseline. There was no difference in the deployment of processes of care measures on day 2 after ICU admission between the two groups. The adjusted OR for the prolonged ED stay group compared with a short ED stay group for each measure were as follows: low tidal volume ventilation 0.92 (95% CI, 0.68-1.22), spontaneous breathing trial 1.12 (95% CI, 0.92-1.35), extubation among those eligible 0.78 (95% CI, 0.55-1.12), deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis 1.13 (95% CI, 0.95-1.34), and continuous sedation 0.92 (95% CI, 0.81-1.06). CONCLUSIONS: In this multicenter study of critically ill adult patients, a prolonged ED stay was not associated with a significant difference in the deployment of evidence-based process of care measures for critically ill adult patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Association of Prolonged Emergency Department Length of Stay With Process of Care Measures for Critically Ill Patients
Date Crossref
07/01/2026
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Emergency and Acute Care StudiesSepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.