Integrating neuropsychoanalytic and neuropsychiatric perspectives into psychiatric clinical neuroscience curricula: a conceptual overview
Résumé fourni par la source
Objectives: Neuropsychoanalysis and neuropsychiatry are two rapidly advancing fields that can provide valuable additions to a clinical neuroscience curriculum in psychiatry and strengthen psychiatrists' psychotherapeutic training and practice. Methods: This article provides an overview of key concepts of neuropsychoanalysis and neuropsychiatry, noting their common history in neurology, psychiatry and psychoanalysis. Several case vignettes are also provided to demonstrate how these concepts could be used to better understand specific psychiatric presentations. Results: Key concepts discussed include the shared history of neuropsychoanalysis and neuropsychiatry; philosophy of mind; the neuroscientific basis and function of different levels of consciousness; affective neuroscience; and the hierarchical network function of the brain. Conclusion: Neuropsychoanalysis and neuropsychiatry are subspecialties that have made important clinical and theoretical contributions to psychiatry. These insights could be used to inform the ongoing development of contemporary psychiatric clinical neuroscience curricula. Relevance to clinical practice: Psychiatrists can use this article to help with "bedside teaching" of junior staff, assist with patient formulation and psychoeducation, and ultimately inform an integrated pedagogical framework for the clinical training of psychiatrists.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Integrating neuropsychoanalytic and neuropsychiatric perspectives into psychiatric clinical neuroscience curricula: a conceptual overview
- Date Crossref
- 05/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Frontiers Media SA
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.