Data from TYK2 Promotes Immunosurveillance of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Colorectal cancer liver metastasis (CRLM) is a major clinical problem. The regulators of immunosurveillance of CRLM could hold potential for developing therapeutic strategies to prevent or treat metastasis. In this study, using a murine colorectal cancer organoid-based transplantation model, we identified TYK2 as a key factor controlling CRLM. Evaluation of the effects of Tyk2 deletion in different subsets of immune cells and in colorectal cancer cells demonstrated that TYK2 was not required in cancer cells, macrophages, NK cells, T cells, or Kupffer cells. Instead, TYK2 controlled CRLM via a dendritic cell–dependent mechanism that relied on MHC-I–mediated cross-presentation of antigens to CD8+ T cells. Analysis of single-cell RNA sequencing data from primary colorectal cancer and CRLM revealed that TYK2 was predominantly expressed in a dendritic cell population destined to present antigens in tumor-draining lymph nodes. Treatment with the TYK2 inhibitor deucravacitinib, which is approved by the FDA for treating plaque psoriasis and is under clinical investigation for other autoimmune diseases, promoted CRLM. Together, these data demonstrate that TYK2 controls CRLM immunosurveillance, which should be carefully considered when treating patients with TYK2 inhibitors. Significance: TYK2 restricts the metastasis of colorectal tumors to the liver by supporting dendritic cell-dependent induction of antitumor CD8+ T cells, which could impact the use of TYK2 inhibitors in patients.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Data from TYK2 Promotes Immunosurveillance of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
- Date Crossref
- 02/01/2026
- Éditeur
- American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.