Relationships Between Loaded Countermovement Jumps and 1-RM Back Squat: A Discrete Metrics and Waveform Analysis
Rattachement africain : au, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background/Objectives: This study evaluated the differences in force–time characteristics of different incrementally loaded countermovement jumps (CMJs) and assessed their relationship to one-repetition maximum (1-RM) back squat performance. Methods: Nineteen resistance-trained males participated in this cross-sectional study, performing CMJs under six conditions (0%, 20%, 40%, 60%, 80%, and 100% body mass) followed by a 1-RM back squat. Multiple regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between discrete CMJ metrics (net concentric impulse, net concentric mean force, eccentric duration) with 1-RM values. Additionally, one-dimensional statistical parametric mapping (SPM) was used to evaluate the intact force–time curve between jump conditions. Results: The multiple regression models explained 53–66% of the variance in 1-RM squat performance, which was greatest under the 80% body mass condition. One-dimensional SPM analysis revealed significant differences in force–time curves across all loading conditions. Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that metrics from a loaded CMJ explained up to 66% of variance in the 1-RM back squat, suggesting the two tests are independent measures of strength. Further, each loaded jump condition elicited unique force-time curves, suggesting that each load requires a different neuromuscular technique.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Relationships Between Loaded Countermovement Jumps and 1-RM Back Squat: A Discrete Metrics and Waveform Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.