Fetal Echocardiographic Features for the Prediction of the Development of Aortic Coarctation in the Perinatal Period
Rattachement africain : it, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
PURPOSE: Aortic coarctation (CoA) is a congenital structural anomaly with one of the lowest detection rates among heart diseases. Improving diagnostic rates allows for the centralization of high-risk cases in hospitals with pediatric cardiac surgery facilities, thereby reducing neonatal mortality and morbidity. This study aims to evaluate new diagnostic protocols to enhance the clinical and outpatient management of suspected CoA cases. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted, focusing on various echocardiographic parameters to identify the most predictive indicators for CoA. RESULTS: A total of 184 cases with a prevalence of right-sided heart sections were identified, with 128 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. Of these, 15 cases of CoA were confirmed postnatally, representing 11.7% of the cohort. Among these, 80% showed early echocardiographic signs of CoA. The ratio of pulmonary valve (PV) to aortic valve (AV) diameters emerged as the most reliable parameter, especially in early gestation, while the z-score of the aortic isthmus was also a strong predictor. CONCLUSION: The use of simple, reliable echocardiographic parameters can improve the detection rate of high-risk CoA cases, enabling better clinical management and improved neonatal outcomes in both the short and long term.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Fetal Echocardiographic Features for the Prediction of the Development of Aortic Coarctation in the Perinatal Period
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.