Vaporized cannabis versus placebo for acute migraine: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled crossover trial
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of cannabis for the treatment of acute migraine. BACKGROUND: Preclinical and retrospective studies suggest cannabinoids may be effective in migraine treatment. However, there have been no randomized clinical trials examining the efficacy of cannabinoids for acute migraine. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial, adults with migraine treated up to four separate migraine attacks, one each with vaporized (1) 6% Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) (THC-dominant), (2) 11% cannabidiol (CBD) (CBD-dominant), (3) 6% THC + 11% CBD, and (4) placebo cannabis flower in a randomized order. Washout period between treated migraine attacks was ≥1 week. The primary endpoint was pain relief, and secondary endpoints were pain freedom and most bothersome symptom freedom, all assessed at 2-h post-vaporization. RESULTS: Ninety-two participants were enrolled and randomized, and 247 migraine attacks were treated. THC + CBD was superior to placebo at achieving pain relief (67.2% vs. 46.6%, odds ratio [95% confidence interval] 2.85 [1.22, 6.65], p = 0.016), pain freedom (34.5% vs. 15.5%, 3.30 [1.24, 8.80], p = 0.017), and most bothersome symptom freedom (60.3% vs. 34.5%, 3.32 [1.45, 7.64], p = 0.005) at 2 h, as well as sustained pain freedom at 24 h and sustained most bothersome symptom freedom at 24 and 48 h. THC-dominant was superior to placebo for pain relief (68.9% vs. 46.6%, 3.14 [1.35, 7.30], p = 0.008) but not pain freedom or most bothersome symptom freedom at 2 h. CBD-dominant was not superior to placebo for pain relief, pain freedom, or most bothersome symptom freedom at 2 h. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: Acute migraine treatment with 6% THC + 11% CBD was superior to placebo at 2-h post-treatment with sustained benefits at 24 and 48 h.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Vaporized cannabis versus placebo for acute migraine: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled crossover trial
- Date Crossref
- 30/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
UC San Diego Health System pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Albert Einstein College of Medicine pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
University of California San Diego Center for Pain Management pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Human Longevity (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeEntreprise
-
Family Health Centers of San Diego pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
UC San Diego Health System, Albert Einstein College of Medicine et Center for Pain Management — University of California San Diego, avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.