Enhanced screening and bacterial sexually-transmitted infection diagnoses after HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis initiation

Résumé fourni par la source

ABSTRACT Background Recipients of HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) experience higher rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses than non-recipients. However, it is unclear if these observations reflect a causal relationship between PrEP initiation and acquisition of sexually transmitted infections (i.e., behavioral “risk compensation”), or alternatively a diagnostic bias related to PrEP recipients screening more frequently than non-recipients. Methods We conducted a self-controlled case series study comparing rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after versus before PrEP initiation among commercially-insured US males in the Merative MarketScan® Research Databases (2016–2019). We compared matched incidence rate ratio (IRR) estimates after versus before PrEP initiation to model-based expectations under a null hypothesis of no change in infection risk. We derived null expectations via a mathematical model reflecting changes in screening after PrEP initiation, estimating parameters under a Bayesian framework. Results Individuals experienced increased rates of gonorrhea (IRR=3.47 [95% confidence interval: 2.57-4.72]) and chlamydia (IRR=3.59 [2.50-5.27]) diagnoses after PrEP initiation, with IRR estimates differing by anatomical site (IRR for either infection=1.23 [0.71-2.13] and 5.98 [3.63-10.29] for urogenital and extragenital diagnoses, respectively). After accounting for increased rates of screening after PrEP initiation, rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses only modestly exceeded expectations under the null hypothesis of no change in infection risk (8-14% greater-than-expected rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses, respectively; one-sided p >0.1 for all tests). Overall, we estimated that 80-81% of observed increases in rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after PrEP initiation, respectively, were attributable to increases in asymptomatic screening. Conclusions Our findings suggest higher-frequency asymptomatic screening, rather than behavioral risk compensation, is the primary driver of increased rates of gonorrhea and chlamydia diagnoses after PrEP initiation.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.