Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 review

94 Meta-Analysis of GERD-Related Outcomes Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Evidence In Favour of Better Outcomes with RYGB Over OAGB in Patients with Pre-Existing GERD

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Aim To evaluate GERD-related outcomes following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) in both primary and revisional bariatric surgeries, with the aim of determining the comparative outcomes with the 2 commonly performed revisional procedures in patients with established GERD. Method A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CINAHL, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and relevant registries was performed. A random-effects meta- analysis was undertaken using PRISMA guidelines to assess GERD remission, de novo GERD, GERD incidence, and endoscopically confirmed oesophagitis between RYGB and OAGB. Results Twenty-one observational studies were included with a total of 4143 patients who underwent either primary or revisional bariatric surgery. GERD remission was more likely following RYGB compared to OAGB in both primary surgery and revision from sleeve gastrectomy (OR= 2.48, 95% CI = [1.04, 5.89], P=0.04). The odds of de novo GERD were significantly higher after OAGB in both primary surgery and revision settings (OR= 0.30, 95% CI = [0.12, 0.74], P = 0.009). The overall incidence of GERD significantly favoured RYGB over OAGB in both primary and revisional cases (OR=0.32, 95% CI = [0.18, 0.58], P = 0.0002). Endoscopically proven oesophagitis was significantly more frequent in OAGB (OR = 0.53, 95% CI = [0.26, 1.08], P=0.08). Conclusions OAGB is associated with higher rates of de novo GERD, increased GERD incidence, and more frequent endoscopic evidence of oesophagitis when compared to RYGB. These findings suggest that OAGB should be used with caution in patients known GERD or to be considered with a close postoperative surveillance.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
94 Meta-Analysis of GERD-Related Outcomes Following Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) Versus One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB): Evidence In Favour of Better Outcomes with RYGB Over OAGB in Patients with Pre-Existing GERD
Date Crossref
01/12/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Bariatric Surgery and OutcomesMinimally Invasive Surgical TechniquesGastric Cancer Management and Outcomes

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.