Identifying key genes for European canker resistance in apple: machine learning and gene expression profiling of quantitative disease resistance
Rattachement africain : gb, se, nl. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
European canker, caused by Neonectria ditissima, is a major disease of apple (Malus × domestica) with limited control options, making host resistance a key management strategy. Although quantitative disease resistance (QDR) has been identified, the underlying molecular basis remains poorly understood. We investigated candidate genes associated with resistance using transcriptomic profiling of a bi-parental population segregating for six QTLs linked to canker resistance. RNA sequencing combined with machine learning enabled the identification of key biomarkers predictive of disease resistance. Integration of expression and QTL data highlighted genes involved in phenylpropanoid biosynthesis, immune receptors (NLRs, RLKs, WAKs), and epigenetic regulators, implicating their roles in host defense. Expression patterns were further resolved into cis- and trans-regulatory effects, providing insight into allele-dependent regulation. Independent validation in a separate dataset confirmed the robustness of key expression patterns. These findings advance understanding of the genetic architecture underlying QDR in apple and provide a basis for marker development to support breeding of cultivars with durable resistance to European canker.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Identifying key genes for European canker resistance in apple: machine learning and gene expression profiling of quantitative disease resistance
- Date Crossref
- 27/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.