Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Neurosurgical Care for Traumatic Brain Injury in Low-Resource Settings: A Multinational Review Evaluating the Influence of Health Systems Framework on Patient Outcomes

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a leading global cause of death and disability, disproportionately impacting low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where neurosurgical resources are often limited. In these settings, foundational gaps in health system infrastructure—such as limited internet access, absence of electronic medical records (EMRs), and lack of standardized protocols—impede timely diagnosis, intervention, and continuity of care. This study evaluates the relationship between health system infrastructure and neurosurgical capacity, intervention delivery, and TBI outcomes across LMICs. We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines across PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify studies examining TBI care and system infrastructure in LMIC institutions. Extracted data were categorized across two primary domains: (1) clinical management and patient outcomes, and (2) implementation of health system components, including EMRs, information and communication technology access, and standardized care protocols. Quantitative analysis incorporated descriptive statistics, chi-square testing, Kruskal–Wallis tests, Glasgow Coma Scale-adjusted linear regression models, and machine learning classifiers to examine associations. Of the LMIC institutions reviewed, only 41% reported the presence of neurosurgical capacity. Implementation of EMRs and standardized protocols was significantly associated with increased neurosurgical capacity (odds ratio [OR] = 1.1, p = 0.06; OR = 1.1, p = 0.03, respectively). Among facilities with operative capacity, the median neurosurgical intervention rate was 28% (interquartile range [IQR]: 3–33%). Policy implementation predicted reduced post-TBI mortality ( B = −10.8, p = 0.06; R 2 = 0.56), with a median institutional mortality rate of 19% (IQR: 8–17%). Machine learning models demonstrated strong discriminatory ability to predict TBI mortality based on neurosurgical capacity and infrastructure metrics (area under the curve = 0.76). These findings highlight the potential for health system infrastructure—particularly EMRs, internet access, and standardized clinical protocols—to improve neurosurgical readiness and reduce preventable mortality following TBI in LMICs. Strategic investment in digital health tools and policy standardization could be a high-yield, scalable approach to closing global neurosurgical care gaps and improving TBI outcomes in resource-limited settings.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Neurosurgical Care for Traumatic Brain Injury in Low-Resource Settings: A Multinational Review Evaluating the Influence of Health Systems Framework on Patient Outcomes
Date Crossref
12/12/2025
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Global Health and SurgeryTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular DisturbancesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.