Preclinical Study on Sabin Strain-Based DTaP-sIPV/Hib Pentavalent Vaccine: Evaluation of Repeated-Dose Toxicity and Immunogenicity

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: type b (Hib) infections pose severe threats to children's health globally. This study evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a novel Sabin strain-based adsorbed pentavalent vaccine (DTacP-sIPV/Hib), which offers potential advantages in biosafety and cost-effectiveness compared to wild-type poliovirus-based vaccines. METHODS: A repeated-dose toxicity study was conducted in 190 Sprague-Dawley rats, randomly divided into negative control, adjuvant control, low-dose, and high-dose groups. Animals received five intramuscular injections at 21-day intervals, followed by a 56-day recovery period. Parameters assessed included local reactions, body temperature, hematology, serum biochemistry, coagulation, histopathology, T-cell subsets, cytokine levels, and antigen-specific immunogenicity. RESULTS: The primary adverse reaction was dose-dependent local muscle swelling, which was fully reversible within 3-21 days. Only transient body temperature fluctuations and adjuvant-related hematological/biochemical abnormalities were observed, all resolving after the recovery period. No vaccine-related damage occurred in hepatic/renal function or immune organs. Immunogenicity data showed 100% seroconversion for all bacterial components 21 days after the first dose. The high-dose group achieved 100% seropositivity for all poliovirus serotypes after the second dose, while the low-dose group reached the same after the third dose, with no significant difference in antibody levels between dose groups. CONCLUSIONS: The DTacP-sIPV/Hib vaccine exhibits a favorable safety profile and robust immunogenicity in rats, supporting its further clinical development. The use of Sabin strains reduces biosafety risks and manufacturing costs, making this vaccine a promising candidate for immunization programs, especially in resource-limited regions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.