Cerebral Blood Flow and Blood–Brain Barrier Water Exchange in Major Depressive Disorder: Evidence from Diffusion-Prepared Arterial Spin Labelling MRI

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Diffusion-prepared pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling (DP-pCASL) can quantify the cerebral blood flow (CBF) and the water exchange rate (kw) across the blood–brain barrier (BBB). Little is known about the BBB water exchange in major depressive disorder (MDD). Objective: We aimed to explore the associations between kw, CBF, peripheral inflammation, and MDD. Methods: Using DP-pCASL, we measured the global and selected regional kw and CBF together with blood plasma levels of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and inflammatory cytokines in 85 patients with MDD and 51 controls. Results: The global CBF was significantly lower in MDD patients compared with controls (means of 51 and 57 mL/100 g/min, respectively; p = 0.006), with similar reductions found in the dorsolateral and ventromedial prefrontal, anterior, and posterior cingulate regions, while no differences were found in the amygdala and the isthmic cingulate. There were no differences in the kw between groups globally (means of 128 min−1; p = 0.958) and in the studied regions. Among MDD patients, the kw was weakly correlated with the MADRS scores (r = 0.231, p = 0.034). There were no associations between kw, CBF, and inflammatory markers (LPS, IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α, IFN-γ). Logistic regression showed that a combination of the regional CBF < 59.22 mL/100 g/min together with LPS > 143.58 pg/mL and/or IL-10 > 0 pg/mL distinguished MDD patients from controls with a moderate accuracy of 83.1% (sensitivity = 94.1%, specificity = 64.7%, AUC = 0.876). Conclusions: DP-pCASL imaging confirmed previous findings of reduced CBF in MDD, which together with LPS and IL-10 concentrations were independent significant predictors of MDD. However, no changes in the BBB water exchange were found, suggesting that it may not be as significant as CBF in MDD pathophysiology.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.