Faithfulness-Aware Multi-Objective Context Ranking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has emerged as a dominant paradigm for enhancing Large Language Models (LLMs) with external knowledge. However, existing ranking methods in RAG pipelines primarily optimize for document-query relevance, neglecting crucial factors for generation quality such as factual consistency and information coverage. We propose a novel multiobjective ranking framework that explicitly models three critical dimensions: relevance, coverage, and faithfulness support. Unlike traditional IR-centric approaches, our method introduces a utilitybased scoring mechanism that evaluates each document’s contribution to reducing hallucinations, improving answer completeness, and maintaining relevance. We formulate the ranking problem as a multi-objective optimization task and employ listwise learning with carefully constructed utility labels derived from existing QA datasets. Extensive experiments on Natural Questions, TriviaQA, and HotpotQA demonstrate that our approach achieves substantial improvements over state-of-the-art baselines, with an average 4.8- point increase (8.6% relative improvement) in Exact Match scores, 10.1% improvement in faithfulness metrics, and 35.7% reduction in hallucination rates compared to RankRAG, all while maintaining computational efficiency comparable to traditional reranking methods.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Faithfulness-Aware Multi-Objective Context Ranking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
- Date Crossref
- 22/12/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.