Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Co-Designing Effective Pediatric Vaccine Promotion Strategies: Insights From Rural Wisconsin Parents

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
1Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Rural distrust in science, intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic, has led to concern about the ongoing uptake of pediatric vaccination. It is also unclear how to most effectively promote health behaviors within rural communities. This study was designed to explore how rural parents interpret vaccine promotion message components, including text, images, and sponsorships, and design their own messages to provide insights for public health. Rural-living parents in Wisconsin ( n = 27) were recruited to participate in virtual, 90-minute focus groups/co-design sessions regarding vaccine promotion in which they were asked to evaluate the effectiveness of researcher-provided textual messages, images, and sponsorship and create final public service announcements (PSAs) with elements they believed would resonate with other rural parents. As the conceptual model guiding this work was the theory of planned behavior, our focus was on the interpretations and attitudes that participants brought to the task of creating PSAs and their perceptions of social norms in their community. Braun and Clarke’s 6-step thematic analysis was applied to qualitative data. Participants created PSAs that affirmed active parental roles in health care and emphasized local context and “relatability.” Feelings were mixed about national-level organizations. While some reported negative connotations, others recognized knowledge and competence. Participants had negative assessments of message elements that referred to rural communities as stereotypical or homogeneous. Tailoring to include local, familiar, and relatable messages, images, and sponsors that emphasize parent roles in health decision-making and the knowledge of local providers is preferred among rural parents.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Co-Designing Effective Pediatric Vaccine Promotion Strategies: Insights From Rural Wisconsin Parents
Date Crossref
24/12/2025
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • University of Wisconsin–Madison pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • Wisconsin Council of Churches pays non établi dans la notice
    Institution

University of Wisconsin–Madison et Wisconsin Council of Churches.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Vaccine Coverage and HesitancyHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityFocus Groups and Qualitative Methods

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.