An introduced parasitoid facilitates host range expansion of a resident parasitoid
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Invasive species can cause maladaptive behaviours in native consumers, with evolution of behavioural or physiological traits thought to be the main way out of these so-called ‘evolutionary traps’. However, shorter-term ecological processes resulting from biological invasions could provide other ways to escape evolutionary traps. Asobara cf. rufescens , a resident (i.e., possibly native or previously introduced) parasitoid of drosophilid fly larvae in North America, can rarely produce offspring on the invasive fruit pest Drosophila suzukii in the laboratory, but in often emerges from field-collected D. suzukii . We hypothesized that the successful development of A. cf. rufescens in D. suzukii in the field is facilitated by Leptopilina japonica , a recently introduced parasitoid of D. suzukii . In laboratory experiments, we found that A. cf. rufescens had more than 30-fold higher offspring emergence from D. suzukii when L. japonica was also present. This facilitation occurred most frequently when A. cf. rufescens parasitized D. suzukii after L. japonica , possibly because parasitism by L. japonica destroyed the hosts’ cellular immunity that would otherwise prevent A. cf. rufescens development. The recent arrival of L. japonica may have partially rescued A. cf. rufescens from the evolutionary trap set by D. suzukii and, consequently, resulted in an expansion of its host range.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- An introduced parasitoid facilitates host range expansion of a resident parasitoid
- Date Crossref
- 24/12/2025
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.