Influences of Ring Sizes and Chiral Substituents on Macrocyclic Chelators for Improving 68 Ga Radiolabeling
Rattachement africain : hk, gb, us, fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
High Resolution Image Download MS PowerPoint Slide 68 Ga-labeled macrocyclic ligands have been extensively studied and used for positron emission tomography (PET) imaging. Compared with 12-membered DOTA derivatives, NOTA-based chelators with 9-membered macrocyclic rings exhibit more advantageous coordination stability for Ga 3+ ions. However, studies of the 10-membered DETA macrocycle are still quite limited. Here, we present the synthesis of four different-sized chiral macrocyclic ligands L1–L4, followed by radiolabeling and stability studies to reveal the influence of ring size and chiral substituents on Ga 3+ chelation. In the 68 Ga radiolabeling experiments, chiral NOTA L1 exhibits the highest radiochemical yield of 99% at 25 °C. While for the chiral DETA L2 / L3 and the chiral DOTA L4, their radiolabeling efficiencies are inferior at room temperature, but remarkable improvements were observed at higher temperatures. L1–L4 all exhibit superior Ga 3+ coordination stability than their achiral counterparts, while the chiral DETA L2 with an α-methyl group shows a slightly better performance than its β-analogue L3 . Serum stability tests and kinetic studies under acid and alkaline conditions were conducted, highlighting the favorable kinetic inertness of these chiral ligands for potential 68 Ga-labeled PET imaging applications.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Influences of Ring Sizes and Chiral Substituents on Macrocyclic Chelators for Improving <sup>68</sup> Ga Radiolabeling
- Date Crossref
- 23/12/2025
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.