qPCR-based prediction of low-level microcystin-LR using mcyE and passive sampling across multiple lakes and years
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Microcystin-LR (MC-LR) is a cyanobacterial hepatotoxin that poses health risks even at low concentrations. Because quantitative analysis of MC-LR is costly and time-consuming, water managers rely on early warning tools to determine when confirmatory testing is warranted. Quantitative PCR (qPCR) targeting the mcy genes has emerged as one such tool, but its reliability across lakes and seasons — particularly at low toxin concentrations — remains unclear. In this study, we used passive sampling to detect low concentrations (< 1 µg L −1 ) of MC-LR and paired this with qPCR monitoring of mcyE to assess whether mcyE alone can serve as a reliable indicator of low-level MC-LR presence over three years across ten lakes (total of n = 893 distinct samples). We developed location- and year-specific hierarchical Bayesian models to estimate the probability of MC-LR detection from mcyE concentrations. We also included environmental covariates to determine if their inclusion improved model performance. Although mcyE was the strongest overall predictor, its relationship with MC-LR varied substantially by location and year, and these hierarchical models were essential in capturing this variability. These findings highlight the promise of mcyE -based early warning systems for low-concentrations of MC-LR but emphasize that interpretation must be tailored to local ecological and seasonal conditions.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- qPCR-based prediction of low-level microcystin-LR using mcyE and passive sampling across multiple lakes and years
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.