Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Using the Comparing Oral versus Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (COPAT) Clinical Trial to Influence Institutional Practice Transformation Towards Earlier Transition to Oral Antibiotics

5Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
9Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Extensive literature has established equivalent efficacy of early intravenous (IV) to oral antibiotic transition. However, there is variability in adoption across practice settings. Unlike Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (OPAT) programs, Complex Outpatient Antimicrobial Therapy with Oral Agents (COpAT) programs face significant implementation science challenges. We used a clinical trial with broad enrollment criteria to determine the impact of early oral transition in a real-world setting and studied its influence on practice transformation. METHODS: Comparing Oral versus Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (COPAT) Trial was a pragmatic, randomized controlled trial at 5 hospitals in 1 rural health system. Patients who required 2 or more weeks of IV antibiotics (for all but central nervous system infections) were randomized 2:1 to experimental (early-oral) group or control (IV-only) group. Two primary outcomes and hypotheses were assessed at 3 months: early-oral group safety superiority and efficacy equivalence. Clinical cases of patients who completed the trial were presented at multiple forums. RESULTS: The trial was stopped early after two-thirds enrollment for a significant safety benefit. Early-oral group demonstrated a significantly lower adverse event rate (3.2% versus 6.5%, P = .02). Lower cumulative hazard for first study-related adverse event in early-oral group (hazard ratio, 0.24; 95% confidence interval, .08-.75; P = .01) appeared to emerge by day 10. Therapeutic efficacy was equivalent. Cumulative enrollment in the trial had a significant association with the COpAT:OPAT program consult ratio (R2= 0.54, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Early oral antibiotic transition was significantly safer. At our academic health system, implementation of the COPAT Trial accelerated practice transformation. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT05977868.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Using the Comparing Oral versus Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy (COPAT) Clinical Trial to Influence Institutional Practice Transformation Towards Earlier Transition to Oral Antibiotics
Date Crossref
19/12/2025
Éditeur
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Antibiotic Use and ResistanceBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingClostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.