A nomogram to predict large-for-gestational-age in term newborns: A retrospective single-center study
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
This study aims to build and validate a nomogram for large-for-gestational-age (LGA) prediction in full-term (37-41 weeks of gestation) newborns. This retrospective single-center study included consecutive full-term deliveries (37-41 weeks' gestation) at Yuyao People's Hospital of Zhejiang Province from January to December 2021. Participants were randomly assigned (7:3) to training and validation sets. The current study included 1481 deliveries (training n = 1017; validation n = 464). Gestational age (odds ratio [OR] = 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.13-1.54), gestational weight gain (OR = 1.07, 95% CI: 1.03-1.12), symphysis-fundal height (OR = 1.14, 95% CI: 1.03-1.27), fetal abdominal circumference (OR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.09-1.12), triglycerides (OR = 1.49, 95% CI: 1.08-2.05), gestational diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.33-3.14), and pre-pregnancy body mass index < 18.5 (OR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.28-0.81) had independent associations with LGA. A nomogram was developed, and receiver operating characteristic curves had areas under the curves of 0.846 (95% CI: 0.821-0.871) and 0.802 (95% CI: 0.761-0.842) in the training and validation sets, respectively. Seven factors were independently associated with LGA. A nomogram was developed and showed favorable predictive performance.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A nomogram to predict large-for-gestational-age in term newborns: A retrospective single-center study
- Date Crossref
- 19/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.