Simulated patient systems powered by large language model-based AI agents offer potential for transforming medical education

Le résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Simulated patient systems are vital in medical education and research, providing safe, integrative training environments and supporting clinical decision-making. Progressive Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies, such as Large Language Models (LLM), could advance simulated patient systems by replicating medical conditions and patient-doctor interactions with high fidelity and low cost. However, effectiveness and trustworthiness remain challenging. METHODS: We developed AIPatient, a simulated patient system powered by LLM-based AI agents. The system incorporates the Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) framework, powered by six task-specific LLM-based AI agents for complex reasoning. For simulation reality, the system is also powered by the AIPatient KG (Knowledge Graph), built with de-identified real patient data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC)-III database. RESULTS: Here we show that the system's accuracy in Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based medical Question Answering (QA), readability, robustness, and stability. Specifically, the system achieves a QA accuracy of 94.15% when all six agents, surpassing benchmarks with partial or no agent integration. Its knowledgebase demonstrates high validity (F1 score=0.89). Readability scores show median Flesch Reading Ease at 68.77 and median Flesch Kincaid Grade at 6.4, indicating accessibility to all medical professionals. Robustness and stability are confirmed with non-significant variance (ANOVA F-value = 0.6126, p > 0.1; F-value = 0.782, p > 0.1). A user study with medical students shows that AIPatient delivers high fidelity, usability, and educational value, matching or exceeding human-simulated patients in history-taking. CONCLUSIONS: Large language model-based simulated patient systems provide accurate, readable, and reliable medical encounters and demonstrates potential to transform medical education.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.