NP-Hard Optimization in HP Model Protein Folding: A Systematic Review of Simulated Annealing, Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Tabu Search
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Protein folding prediction in the HP model is an NP-hard problem which highly needs effective heuristic methods to optimize. Protein folding prediction in the HP model is an NP-hard problem which highly needs effective heuristic methods to optimize. This paper reviews and compares four well-known meta-heuristic algorithms, namely Simulated Annealing (SA), Genetic Algorithm (GA), Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), and Tabu Search (TS), focused on three main aspects: ability to cross the energy barrier, robustness to initial solutions, and computational cost. The results show that each algorithm has its strength, namely, SA searching exceling in early-stage exploration, GA providing a stable solution with population diversity, PSO efficiently achieving rapid convergence while maintaining moderate robustness, and TS escaping local minima. This study does not aim to identify a single optimal method, but to elucidate the contexts and conditions under which each heuristic approach can be effectively applied to the protein folding problem. The review will become a practical guide for selecting an optimization method for protein structure prediction where NP-hard problems exist.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- NP-Hard Optimization in HP Model Protein Folding: A Systematic Review of Simulated Annealing, Genetic Algorithm, Particle Swarm Optimization, and Tabu Search
- Date Crossref
- 19/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Dean & Francis Press
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.