Thermal Limits of the Estuarine Amphipod Melita palmata Under Different Salinities and Its Relevance for Aquaculture Production

Résumé fourni par la source

Estuarine organisms experience frequent fluctuations in salinity and temperature, facing major challenges to their physiological homeostasis. Such variability can promote high energetic costs for osmoregulation, potentially reducing tolerance to additional stressors. We investigated the effect of salinity on the thermal tolerance of the estuarine amphipod Melita palmata (Montagu, 1804), a species of growing interest for aquaculture, either as live feed or as a potential source for essential fatty acids in formulated diets. The critical thermal maximum (CTmax) was determined for males and females collected from three sites within a temperate coastal lagoon (Ria de Aveiro, Portugal) characterized by different salinity regimes (15, 20, and 30). Individuals from lower-salinity environments exhibited significantly lower CTmax values than those from higher salinities, indicating that osmoregulatory costs may restrict thermal resistance. No significant sex-based differences in CTmax were detected. However, thermal safety margins (TSMs) increased with salinity, indicating greater thermal tolerance under higher salinity conditions, and differences in body condition index (BCI) between sites suggest salinity-related effects on growth performance. These results highlight that the elevated energetic demands of osmoregulation under hypo-osmotic conditions can constrain the thermal limits of M. palmata, underscoring the complex trade-offs between environmental variability and physiological performance in estuarine habitats. Beyond its ecological implications, understanding the physiological responses of M. palmata to salinity and temperature is key, optimising its use in aquaculture. The species’ physiological plasticity under such variable conditions reinforces its suitability for aquaculture production, particularly in earthen ponds in estuarine environments.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.