Hypoglossal nerve stimulation in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: Update on French practices and position paper of the SFRMS, SPLF and SFORL sleep medicine work-group
Rattachement africain : fr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To update practices for setting up, follow-up and indications in hypoglossal nerve stimulation in France. METHODS: Analysis of Medline, Cochrane and Embase databases (1970-2024), with assessment of techniques, follow-up modalities, results and side effects. Six physicians (3 ENT specialists, 3 pulmonologists, all involved in hypoglossal stimulation) took part in a work-group between January 2024 and January 2025. RESULTS: ) patients with moderate-to-severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) (apnea/hypopnea index [AHI] 15-50/h), and failure of or contraindications for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or mandibular advancement device (MAD). Prior drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) is mandatory. Studies show a 68% decrease in AHI, 70% decrease in oxygen desaturation index (ODI) at 12months, and improvements in somnolence and quality of life, which seem stable at 36months. About 25% of patients experience side effects, which are mostly transient. Final set-up requires polysomnography; follow-up requires clinical examination and/or poly(somno)graphy. CONCLUSION: This new alternative treatment in France should be proposed for symptomatic patients with failure of CPAP or MAD, rigorously screened in multidisciplinary centers.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Hypoglossal nerve stimulation in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: Update on French practices and position paper of the SFRMS, SPLF and SFORL sleep medicine work-group
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2026
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.