Noise Suppression in Ultra-Low-Dose CT for LAFOV PET/CT via Unpaired CycleGAN Training
Résumé fourni par la source
Reducing radiation dose in positron emission tomography / computed tomography (PET/CT) is critical, and recent advances in ultra-low-dose (ULD)-CT protocols have enabled up to a 98% reduction in CT radiation exposure. However, this comes at the cost of increased image noise and reduced anatomical detail, which may hinder visual interpretation in some clinical indications. While low-dose (LD) CT, typically used in PET/CT, is not of diagnostic quality, it provides adequate anatomical information for attenuation correction and localization. This study introduces a deep learning-based denoising approach using a cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (cGAN) to enhance ULD-CT image quality. A total of 70 patient scans were used: 51 for training and internal validation and 19 for external validation. Due to slight anatomical mismatches, the model was trained on unpaired two-dimensional slices. Performance was assessed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and multiple image similarity metrics. Results showed that synthetic cGAN-CT images improved SNR and CNR across the lung, liver, and bone, with relative differences to LD-CT under 16%, while ULD-CT deviated by over 60%. Image similarity metrics confirmed that cGAN-CT achieved structural quality comparable to LD-CT. This approach supports substantial dose reduction while preserving image quality for clinical PET/CT interpretation.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Noise Suppression in Ultra-Low-Dose CT for LAFOV PET/CT via Unpaired CycleGAN Training
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2025
- Éditeur
- IEEE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.