Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Comparative Evaluation of a Domestic Automatic Milking System and a Commercial System: Effects of Parity on Milk Performance and System Capacity

1Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : kr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

This study evaluated milking characteristics and milk productivity of a domestically developed automatic milking system (AMS-K) and compared its performance with a commercially imported AMS (AMS-C), under identical farm management conditions. Milking performance of AMS-K was monitored over a three-month operating period, and a comparative analysis was subsequently conducted using a total of 50 Holstein cows, with 25 cows allocated to each system based on similar parity, days in milk, and milk yield. During the three-month operation of AMS-K, milk yield per milking significantly increased in from 13.81 kg in the 1st month to 15.99 kg in the 3rd month, and daily milk yield increased by 4.01-7.52% compared with the initial operating period. Milking frequency decreased from 2.53 to 2.27 times per day, but remained higher than conventional twice-daily milking. Average milking interval increased from 9.37 to 10.34 h, which was within the optimal range (9-10 h) for AMS operation. Milking stall occupancy and teat-cup attachment times gradually increased, whereas milking time showed no significant change. Somatic cell count initially increased but stabilized after three months. Milking efficiency ranged from 2.44 to 2.56 kg/min. In the system comparison, AMS-C showed shorter milking stall occupancy time, higher milking frequency, and higher milking efficiency than AMS-K, whereas AMS-K showed higher milk yield per milking, associated with longer milking interval. Across both systems, multiparous cows exhibited longer milking intervals and higher milk yields than primiparous cows in both AMSs. Theoretical milking capacity per AMS was 54.45 cows (primiparous) and 37.77 cows (multiparous) for AMS-K, sufficient for an average Korean dairy farm. Our results demonstrate that AMS-K achieved stable milking performance, milk quality, and operational efficiency comparable to the imported AMS. AMS-K shows great potential for practical applications and commercialization in Korean dairy farms.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Comparative Evaluation of a Domestic Automatic Milking System and a Commercial System: Effects of Parity on Milk Performance and System Capacity
Date Crossref
18/12/2025
Éditeur
MDPI AG
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Rural Development Administration pays non établi dans la notice
    Organisme public
  • Daewoo Electronics (South Korea) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • Daewoo Pharma (South Korea) pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise
  • Seoul National University Department of Agriculture Biotechnology pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • National Institute of Animal Science Dairy Science Division pays non établi dans la notice
    Structure de recherche
  • Ltd. Dawoon Co. pays non établi dans la notice
    Entreprise

Rural Development Administration, Daewoo Electronics (South Korea) et Daewoo Pharma (South Korea), avec 3 autres affiliations.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Milk Quality and Mastitis in Dairy CowsAnimal Behavior and Welfare StudiesEffects of Environmental Stressors on Livestock

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.