Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2025 article

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Retrospective Analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : tr. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Objective: Stroke is the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability globally, with carotid artery stenosis contributing to approximately 20% of cases.Carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are effective treatments to reduce stroke risk.While some studies report higher complication rates for CAS compared to CEA, others demonstrate comparable outcomes, emphasizing the importance of patient selection and procedural optimization.This study evaluates the real-world safety and effectiveness of CAS in 52 patients at a single institution.Methods: This retrospective analysis included 52 patients who underwent CAS between 2020 and 2024.Inclusion criteria were ≥50% stenosis for symptomatic patients and >60% stenosis for asymptomatic ones.Dual antiplatelet therapy was initiated preoperatively, and distal filter embolic protection was used in all procedures.Neurological assessments and radiological imaging were performed pre-and post-procedure.Complications were categorized as periprocedural or post-procedural, and follow-ups were conducted at three, six, and twelve months.Results: The cohort included 52 patients (78.8% symptomatic, mean stenosis rate: 80.3%±12.5%).Periprocedural ischemic stroke occurred in 5.8% of patients, and asymptomatic diffusion-restricted areas were detected in 34.6% of patients.One patient (2.2%) experienced symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage.The overall periprocedural stroke and death rate was 7.7%.Conclusion: CAS is a minimally invasive, effective option for treating carotid artery stenosis when patient selection and procedural protocols are optimized.Ongoing advancements in techniques and devices are anticipated to reduce complications further, supporting CAS as a safe alternative to CEA in selected patients.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Carotid Artery Stenting: A Retrospective Analysis
Date Crossref
18/12/2025
Éditeur
Galenos Yayinevi
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery DiseasesIntracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and ComplicationsCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.