Long-term safety and efficacy of voclosporin in Asian patients with lupus nephritis: A post hoc analysis of the AURORA 2 trial
Rattachement africain : jp, ph, au, us, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the long-term safety and efficacy of voclosporin in Asian patients with lupus nephritis who completed the AURORA 1 phase III study and enrolled in the AURORA 2 phase III continuation study. METHODS: This post hoc analysis included 3 years of pooled data (AURORA 1 and AURORA 2). The double-blinded voclosporin or control treatment assigned in AURORA 1 was continued in AURORA 2. Safety and efficacy (renal response) were evaluated. RESULTS: Sixty Asian patients were included (voclosporin, n = 30; control, n = 30). Adverse events occurred in 93.3 and 100.0% of voclosporin-treated and control patients, respectively. More patients in the voclosporin vs control group experienced decreased glomerular filtration rate (26.7 vs. 6.7%) and hypertension (33.3 vs. 10.0%); rates of study drug discontinuation due to adverse events were also lower (3.3 vs. 26.7%). Respective rates of urine protein creatinine ratio ≤0.5 mg/mg achievement were 90.0 and 56.7%; median time to achievement was significantly shorter with voclosporin (6.3 vs. 26.7 months; P = .001). Safety and efficacy were similar to the AURORA 2 overall population. CONCLUSIONS: Asian patients with active lupus nephritis had sustained proteinuria reductions and a shorter time to proteinuria reduction with voclosporin versus control; voclosporin was well-tolerated.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Long-term safety and efficacy of voclosporin in Asian patients with lupus nephritis: A post hoc analysis of the AURORA 2 trial
- Date Crossref
- 18/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.