Organic mulches and irrigation affect Mesocriconema xenoplax and Pratylenchus penetrans under cherry
Rattachement africain : ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Mesocriconema xenoplax and Pratylenchus penetrans are important plant parasitic nematodes of cherry trees, but little is known of how soil and water management practices affect the buildup of either species in cherry orchards. A split-plot field experiment was initiated in 2014 to compare five soil treatments (untreated control, preplant fumigated, compost, bark chip mulch, compost+bark chip mulch) under drip and microsprinkler irrigation. Plant-parasitic nematode populations were monitored through 2023. The population of M. xenoplax was initially detected in only 3% of the 60 plots whereas P. penetrans was initially present in all plots. By 2023, M. xenoplax were detected in 70% of plots with maximum population density among plots of 834 M. xenoplax 100 cm −1 soil. Mesocriconema xenoplax became more abundant in compost plots and fumigated plots than in untreated plots, and more abundant under drip than microsprinkler irrigation. In contrast, P. penetrans were least abundant in compost plots and less abundant under drip than microsprinkler irrigation. The opposing responses of these two nematode species illustrate tradeoffs in pest pressures that can occur with changes in orchard soil and water management practices, obscuring effects of either species on tree growth.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Organic mulches and irrigation affect <i>Mesocriconema xenoplax</i> and <i>Pratylenchus penetrans</i> under cherry
- Date Crossref
- 01/02/2025
- Éditeur
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.