Impact of Sex on Residual Angina After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Rattachement africain : jp, be, au, it, es, dk, nl, us, ch, se, fr, ua, gb, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Sex-related differences in the clinical presentation of coronary artery disease (CAD) are well recognized. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) characterizes pathophysiological CAD patterns as focal or diffuse. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the influence of sex on residual angina at one year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), stratified by PPG. METHODS: We performed a sub-analysis of PPG Global, a multicenter, prospective, single-arm study. All patients had hemodynamically significant CAD (fractional flow reserve [FFR] ≤ 0.80) and underwent a manual FFR pullbacks to calculate PPG before PCI. Patient-reported outcomes were collected using the 7-item Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7) at baseline and 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: We included 814 patients (205 [25.2%] women and 609 [74.8%] men). Women were significantly older than men (70 ± 10 years vs. 67 ± 10 years p < 0.001). Baseline FFR were comparable between sexes (0.68 ± 0.13 vs. 0.66 ± 0.12, p = 0.098), but women had a more focal CAD compared to men (PPG 0.66 ± 0.15 vs. 0.63 ± 0.15, p = 0.047). Post PCI-FFR was higher in women than men (0.88 ± 0.07 vs. 0.87 ± 0.07, p = 0.041); however, angina at 1 year was more frequent in women (SAQ angina frequency score 94 ± 12 vs. 96 ± 10, p = 0.041). CONCLUSION: Despite having a more focal CAD pattern and achieving higher post-PCI FFR, women report more residual angina than men at 1-year follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04789317.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Impact of Sex on Residual Angina After Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
- Date Crossref
- 17/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.