Harnessing Genomics for Public Health: Use-Case Insights from Uganda
Résumé fourni par la source
Genomic technologies are transforming infectious disease surveillance and control, particularly in resource-limited settings such as Uganda. This review examines ongoing efforts by the Department of National Health Laboratory and Diagnostic Services - Central Public Health Laboratories (NHLDS-CPHL) to integrate genomics into public health strategies. We highlight key advancements, lessons learned, and opportunities, including expanded genomic testing capacity, localized bioinformatics infrastructure, and reinforcement of surveillance systems. Through use-case studies on COVID-19, HIV/AIDS, malaria, Ebola, Mpox, rotavirus, and cholera, we demonstrate the impact of genomics on improving diagnostic accuracy, disease monitoring and outbreak response, identifying drug resistance, and informing targeted public health interventions. Despite these successes, challenges, including but not limited to infrastructure gaps, funding constraints, and ethical considerations, remain, underscoring the need for policy, regulation, and capacity enhancement as well as global collaboration to effectively address these obstacles. Lessons learned from these efforts provide valuable recommendations for optimizing and sustaining genomic programs in low-resource settings. By leveraging genomics, Uganda can further strengthen its ability to detect, monitor, and respond to emerging and re-emerging health threats, ultimately enhancing disease control measures and public health resilience.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Harnessing Genomics for Public Health: Use-Case Insights from Uganda
- Date Crossref
- 16/12/2025
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.