Distinguishing lung cancer from atypical tuberculosis: Deep transfer learning and imaging omics features
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract To address the diagnostic challenge posed by overlapping features, we created a deep learning (DL) model for non‐invasive differentiation of lung cancer (LC) from tuberculosis using clinical and CT data. A total of 229 patients at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Harbin Medical University had their clinical and CT data that were retrospectively gathered. In order to get areas of interest (ROIs), lung window CT images were manually segmented. Extracted features included clinical variables, CT semantic descriptors, radiomic profiles, and 2D/3D DL features. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of each set of features. The model incorporating 3D‐DLF extracted via a 3D‐ResNet network demonstrated the best performance. In the training cohort (sensitivity = 0.976, specificity = 0.961) and the test cohort (sensitivity = 0.789, specificity = 0.935), it obtained an Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.992 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.984–1) and a AUC of 0.963 (95% CI: 0.929–0.998). Performance in the external validation cohort yielded an AUC of 0.709 (95% CI: 0.542–0.876; sensitivity = 0.875, specificity = 0.286). The 3D‐ResNet model outperformed those using clinical, semantic, and conventional radiomic features, highlighting DL's potential to enhance computer‐aided differentiation of LC and tuberculosis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Distinguishing lung cancer from atypical tuberculosis: Deep transfer learning and imaging omics features
- Date Crossref
- 17/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.