Valacyclovir Treatment of Early Symptomatic Alzheimer Disease

Le résumé fourni par la source

Importance: Neuroscientific, epidemiological, and electronic health record studies implicate herpes simplex virus (HSV) as potentially etiological for Alzheimer disease (AD). Objective: To compare the efficacy and adverse effects of valacyclovir vs placebo in participants with early symptomatic AD and HSV seropositivity (HSV-1 or HSV-2). Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial included adults with a clinical diagnosis of probable AD or a clinical diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment with positive biomarkers for AD, a positive serum antibody test (IgG or IgM) for HSV-1 or HSV-2, and a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 18 to 28. The trial was conducted at 3 US outpatient clinics specializing in memory disorders. Recruitment occurred from January 2018 to May 2022; the last follow-up occurred in September 2024. Intervention: Either 4 g/d of valacyclovir (n = 60) or matching placebo (n = 60). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was least-squares mean (LSM) change at 78 weeks in the 11-item Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale Cognitive (ADAS-Cognitive) Subscale score (range, 0-70; higher scores indicate greater impairment). The secondary outcomes were LSM change in the Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study-Activities of Daily Living (ADCS-ADL) Scale score; LSM change in the 18F-florbetapir amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR; higher scores indicate higher amyloid levels) for 6 brain regions (medial orbitofrontal, anterior cingulate, parietal lobe, posterior cingulate, temporal lobe, and precuneus); and LSM change in 18F-MK-6240 tau PET medial temporal SUVR (higher scores indicate higher tau levels) for 4 brain regions (amygdala, hippocampus, entorhinal, and parahippocampus). The frequency of adverse events was the safety outcome. Results: Of the 120 participants (mean age, 71.4 [SD, 8.6] years; 55% were female), 93 (77.5%) completed the trial. At 78 weeks, the LSM change in the 11-item ADAS-Cognitive Subscale score was 10.86 (95% CI, 8.80 to 12.91) in the valacyclovir group vs 6.92 (95% CI, 4.88 to 8.97) in the placebo group, indicating greater cognitive worsening with valacyclovir than placebo (between-group difference, 3.93 [95% CI, 1.03 to 6.83]; P = .01). The LSM change in the ADCS-ADL Scale score at 78 weeks was -13.78 (95% CI, -17.00 to -10.56) in the valacyclovir group vs -10.16 (95% CI, -13.37 to -6.96) in the placebo group (between-group difference, -3.62 [95% CI, -8.16 to 0.93]). At 78 weeks, the LSM change in the 18F-florbetapir amyloid PET SUVR was 0.03 (95% CI, -0.04 to 0.10) in the valacyclovir group vs 0.01 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.08) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.08 to 0.12]). The LSM change in the 18F-MK-6240 tau PET medial temporal SUVR at 78 weeks was 0.07 (95% CI, -0.06 to 0.19) in the valacyclovir group vs -0.04 (95% CI, -0.15 to 0.07) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 0.11 [95% CI, -0.06 to 0.28]). The most common adverse events were elevated serum creatinine level (5 participants [8.3%] in the valacyclovir group vs 2 participants [3.3%] in the placebo group) and COVID-19 infection (3 [5%] vs 2 [3.3%], respectively). Conclusions and Relevance: Valacyclovir was not efficacious with cognitive worsening for the primary outcome and it is not recommended to treat individuals with early symptomatic AD and HSV seropositivity. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03282916.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.