Aller au contenu principal
2025 article

Research priorities in chest wall injury: Secondary analysis of the National Trauma Research Action Plan

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Chest wall injury (CWI) occurs in 10% to 15% of trauma admissions and is associated with significant short- and long-term morbidity. Despite recent advances in management, critical knowledge gaps remain. This study sought to identify consensus-based research priorities for CWI established by the National Trauma Research Action Plan (NTRAP). METHODS: This study is a secondary analysis of consensus-based research priorities collected using an online Delphi survey methodology by 11 NTRAP panels, each focused on different domains across the entire spectrum of trauma care. The database of research questions or gaps was queried for the key words "Chest Wall/Rib," "Rib Fracture/Pain Management," and "Rib Fracture/Pulmonary Management." RESULTS: Fifty-seven CWI-related research questions were identified across seven NTRAP panels. Of these, 15 (26%) were rated as high priority and 42 (74%) as medium priority. Most CWI-related research questions appeared in the following topics: Chest Wall/Ribs (n = 22), followed by Blocks/Regional Anesthesia: Effects on Pain (acute/chronic, hemodynamics, inflammation) (n = 5) and Special Populations: Long-term Outcomes after Trauma in Older Adults; Functional Recovery and Mortality (n = 3). Eighteen questions specifically addressed surgical rib fixation. CONCLUSION: National Trauma Research Action Plan identified 57 consensus-driven research priorities in CWI. These findings should inform extramural funding efforts, focusing on studies that evaluate short-term clinical metrics, comparative effectiveness research between surgical and nonsurgical management, and the long-term impact of CWI on patient recovery and quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic and Epidemiologic; Level V.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Research priorities in chest wall injury: Secondary analysis of the National Trauma Research Action Plan
Date Crossref
17/12/2025
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Trauma Management and DiagnosisTraumatic Ocular and Foreign Body InjuriesTrauma and Emergency Care Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.