Associations between rivaroxaban dose, gut microbiota, and coagulation parameters in a rat model
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Rivaroxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, is widely prescribed for thrombotic disorders, yet growing evidence suggests that gut microbiota may influence its pharmacodynamic effects. This study investigated dose-dependent associations between rivaroxaban administration, gut microbiota composition, and coagulation parameters in a rat model. Twenty-four rats were assigned to control, low-, medium-, and high-dose rivaroxaban groups. After 30 days of administration, 16S rRNA sequencing and plasma coagulation analyses were performed. Rivaroxaban treatment was associated with significant, dose-related alterations in gut microbiota diversity and composition, notably decreasing Allobaculum and increasing Ligilactobacillus faecis abundance. Additionally, Lactobacillus johnsonii exhibited an initial increase followed by a decline at higher doses. Coagulation parameters—prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin time (TT) were prolonged, and fibrinogen (FIB) levels decreased in a dose-dependent manner. Correlation analyses revealed associations between microbial shifts and coagulation indices. These findings indicate associations rather than causation and highlight the need for further mechanistic studies, including models with altered baseline microbiota, to determine whether specific microbial changes modulate rivaroxaban response.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Associations between rivaroxaban dose, gut microbiota, and coagulation parameters in a rat model
- Date Crossref
- 17/12/2025
- Éditeur
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.