Computer-aided quality control in colonoscopy: clinical applications and limitations

Le résumé fourni par la source

Computer-aided quality control (CAQ) systems are redefining colonoscopy by enabling the objective evaluation of procedural metrics and providing real-time feedback. This review explores the clinical utility, implementation barriers, and future prospects of CAQ, with an emphasis on its role in standardizing quality assessment and enhancing patient outcomes. A systematic search of PubMed (inception to January 2025) identified 66 relevant publications, including eight systematic reviews or meta-analyses, seven randomized controlled trials, and five cohort studies, in addition to validation and observational reports. CAQ systems improve traditional quality indicators such as withdrawal time, bowel preparation scores, and cecal intubation rates (CIRs). Emerging metrics-including effective withdrawal time, fold examination quality, and withdrawal speed-offer novel, quantifiable insights. Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy consistently increases adenoma detection rates (from 38.5% to 47.9%) and extends withdrawal time (from 5.68 to 7.03 minutes). Automated systems achieve high accuracy in bowel preparation scoring (93.3%), cecal intubation recognition (95.5%), and surveillance interval assignment (92.0%), thereby addressing persistent gaps in documentation and follow-up care. CAQ systems hold transformative promise for improving colonoscopy quality. Addressing implementation challenges-including false positives, clinician adoption, cost, and regulatory issues-is essential. Future research should emphasize comparative effectiveness, standardized metrics, and large-scale clinical integration to help reduce the burden of colorectal cancer.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.