A Pathway to High Quality Clinical Trials in IgA Vasculitis Nephritis: Meeting Proceedings From a Multiprofessional International Collaborative Workshop

Le résumé fourni par la source

IgA vasculitis (IgAV) is an autoimmune disease that affects the small vessels of the skin, joints, gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and kidneys. In the long term, IgAV associated with nephritis (IgAV-N) can progress to kidney failure. Evidence-based clinical studies of IgAV-N are few, leading to huge variations in treatment approaches and suboptimal outcomes. The wealth of emerging efficacious treatments for IgA nephrology brings new opportunities to this disease. The aim of this report is to describe the proceedings of a multiprofessional collaborative workshop convened to identify the barriers to developing high quality evidence for patients with IgAV-N. A multiprofessional group consisting of 53 attendees from 13 countries met. The meeting was represented by a variety of professional backgrounds, including lay attendees, with different levels of expertise (32% professors and 19% midcareer doctors). Using predefined aims, key themes were extracted, and an action plan developed. Consensus was obtained that there is sufficient similarity between adults and children in terms of the organs involved, pathophysiology, histological features, and likely response to treatment. Important differences included the greater spontaneous improvement in children and worse kidney outcomes in some populations. It was agreed that patients at greatest risk of kidney failure should be the primary focus of initial clinical trials. Important considerations included the following: diagnostic classification for adult onset IgAV, observational data, evidence of scientific similarity to IgA nephropathy (IgAN), an age-inclusive approach to trial design, systemic disease secondary end points, and the inclusion of patient-reported outcomes. This manuscript communicates an expert-informed pathway to high-quality evidence for IgAV-N.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.